Financial markets continue to ignore continuing historical geopolitical developments and maintain a near all-consuming focus on AI.
As estimates for AI capex soar, the key issue remains when investors start to worry about the returns or the lack of them from all this spending with the next test the forthcoming earnings seasons.
For so far virtually all the money in the AI trade has been made by the picks and shovels plays which has amounted, in significant part, to a massive redistribution of wealth from America to North Asia.
This is reflected in the increased capitalisations of the Korean and Taiwanese stock markets.
The combined stock market capitalisations of Korea and Taiwan have almost tripled from US$3.2tn at the start of 2023 when the AI story kicked off in stock markets to US$9.3tn, though down from a peak of US$10.5tn on 22 June, according to Bloomberg.
This is why the absolute and relative performance of the hyperscaler stocks need to be monitored closely.
While they have underperformed of late against the S&P500, they have not yet sold off aggressively on investor concerns about a lack of monetisation.
But that risk is growing with Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft now down 13%, 12%, 16% and 31%, respectively, from their all-time highs reached in May or, in the cases of Microsoft and Meta, in July and August last year.
This has translated into growing relative underperformance of the hyperscalers against the S&P500 even as the S&P500 is still trading near an all-time high.
Thus, the hyperscalers have underperformed the S&P500 by 10% since early May and are down 7.6% from the peak reached in late May on a market cap-weighted basis.
As for the S&P500, it is now only 0.6% below the peak reached on 2 June.
Investors Continue to Ignore Iran’s Potential Impact on Bond Yields
Meanwhile with the latest revival of tensions with Iran, where geopolitics could matter for markets is the bond market where the ten-year Treasury bond yield remains the most important price in world markets.
The ten-year yield has now broken back above the 4.5% level, at 4.56%.
Indeed, how it behaves is probably more important than what the new Fed Chairman says or the FOMC does.
A clear break above the 4.5% level should be viewed by equity investors as a warning, more akin to a yellow signal at a traffic light, but nothing more detrimental given the for now continuing powerful earnings momentum in the US driven by AI capex.
But a more decisive move above 5% would be more like a red traffic light. It would also make it hard for the Fed to avoid renewed monetary tightening even though the base case for now is that the Fed remains on hold.
Higher Treasury bond yields and anticipated renewed Fed tightening, with money markets now expecting 39bp of rate hikes this year compared with 61bp of easing as recently as late February, may well have triggered a short-term bid for the dollar.
In fact the US dollar index is up 5.8% since late January.
But sooner rather than later we think higher yields will become dollar bearish because markets will refocus on America’s still deteriorating fiscal position which in turn will lead to renewed focus on the US dollar debasement trade.
US net interest payments and entitlements were still running at 93.1% of total federal government receipts in the 12 months to May despite the increase in tariff revenues over the past year and more, and those revenues are now falling, having peaked at US$31.35bn in October 2025.
Indeed, tariff revenues declined to a negative US$42m in May as the US Treasury refunded US$21.97bn in tariff revenues previously collected which were declared illegal by the Supreme Court in February.
This more than offset gross tariff collections of US$21.93bn in May.
For Now We Recommend Focusing on Japan’s Monetary Policy
Meanwhile, if the arrival of a new Fed chairman is an important event, and Kevin Warsh sensibly maintained a more hawkish line than expected in his first FOMC meeting in June since the obvious risk is that the markets will test him, this writer’s view remains that the monetary policy debate is most important in Japan at present given that the yen has just broken through the key 160 level. The yen is now Y162/US$.
Inflation remains a hot issue in Japan politically with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s successful election campaign in February featuring a policy to cut the 8% consumption tax on food to zero for two years.
The ruling LDP proposed in June reducing the consumption tax on food and beverages from the current 8% to 1% for two years starting April 2027, as changing the rate to zero would require more time to adjust retailers’ cash register systems!
The Diet also approved a Y3.1tn (US$19bn) supplementary budget in early June to help cushion the impact on consumers of rising fuel costs.
This followed the passage in early April of a record initial budget of Y122tn for this fiscal year.
Such aggressive fiscal easing remains highly risky given the steepening of the yield curve in recent months unless it is matched by an accelerated normalization of monetary policy which has not really happened.
The ten-year JGB yield is now 2.75%, after reaching a nearly 30-year high of 2.90% on 9 July.
Yet Bank of Japan governor Kazuo Ueda remains ultra cautious. Although he raised the uncollateralized overnight call rate to 1% at the June policy meeting, the rate should probably already be 1.5% at a minimum.
Conventional central bank textbook thinking, likely shared by Ueda, is that rate hikes will cause the long end of the bond market to sell off.
But the exact opposite is likely to happen if the Japanese central bank surprises the market by tightening.
Or, in other words, long-term JGB yields would fall.
Such a move would also give greater confidence that the yen has bottomed and that the currency will not break decisively the key 160 level on the chart which there is an air pocket as can be seen in the chart below.
As for the Japanese stock market, the return of inflation remains good news which is why the Topix is trading near an all-time high.
A sign of the return of animal spirits is loan growth of Japan’s major banks which was 8.7% YoY in June, the highest level in six years.
One key issue remains when institutional Japan will finally reallocate out of yen fixed income into equities for the first time since the collapse of the Bubble Economy in the early 1990s.
It remains surprising, even for Japan, that there has not been such an allocation out of yen fixed income given that the Topix has outperformed the 10-year JGB on a total-return basis by 661% since mid-November 2012 prior to the launch of Abenomics at the end of 2012.
Our View on the Yen: Fundamentally Cheap
Returning to the yen, the currency remains fundamentally cheap.
The real effective exchange rate has declined by 66% from the peak reached in April 1995 and is now down 37% since May 2020.
Still, the long-term yen-dollar chart above highlights the risk that the Japanese government could lose control of the currency if it breaks decisively below the 160 level against the US dollar.
While this is not the base case, it represents the risk continuing to be run by Ueda’s hyper cautious approach to normalizing monetary policy.
Remember that the only reason government gross interest payments have been running below 2% of GDP for the past 22 years in Japan has been Japan’s until recently ultra-low bond yields.
Japan’s gross government interest payments to GDP ratio was an estimated 1.5% last year and has averaged 1.7% over the past 22 years, according to the OECD.
By contrast, the same figure in America was 4.7% last year and an average 4.1% over the past 22 years.
The views expressed in Chris Wood’s column on Grizzle reflect Chris Wood’s personal opinion only, and they have not been reviewed or endorsed by Jefferies. The information in the column has not been reviewed or verified by Jefferies. None of Jefferies, its affiliates or employees, directors or officers shall have any liability whatsoever in connection with the content published on this website.
The opinions provided in this article are those of the author and do not constitute investment advice. Readers should assume that the author and/or employees of Grizzle hold positions in the company or companies mentioned in the article. For more information, please see our Content Disclaimer.